Difference between AnthillPro and Bamboo OR
Last month i was discussing with Eric Minick from Anthillpro on Why Build Engineer should be go for AnthillPro instead of Bamboo and i found some interesting inputs which i am sharing below;
INTRODUCTION
Bamboo is a respectable team level continuous integration server. Continuous Integration servers are focused on providing feedback to developers about the quality of their recent
builds, and how that compares to previous builds. While AnthillPro also provides continuous integration features, it pays special attention to what hAnthillpropens after build time.
Where is the build deployed? How does it get tested in the hours, days and weeks after the build occurs? Who releases the software and how? Read more click here
Reference:- This article was originally posted on scmGalaxy.com
| Mantosh Singh | Corporate learning & Development Manager M: +91 700 483 5930 mantosh@scmGalaxy.com Skype - scmGalaxy |
5000+ Trainings | 100+ Courses | Experienced Trainers | Lifetime Membership
I would like to say thanks to author of this blog for encouraging the people to know about Devops Online Training
ReplyDeleteThanks for this detailed comparison — it’s really helpful to see AnthillPro and Atlassian tools laid out side-by-side, especially since both are powerful in very different ways. I’ve often struggled to understand not just what the features are but how they actually impact workflow decisions, and your breakdown of strengths and limitations made it much clearer where each tool shines. I especially appreciated the parts that discussed real-world use cases like build management, release coordination, and integration with other DevOps tools — those are the details that help teams choose the right fit rather than just picking based on name recognition. One suggestion for future posts would be to include a short summary table or decision-criteria list that highlights when each tool is best suited (e.g., small teams vs enterprise pipelines), which would make applying this comparison even easier. Overall, this felt like a thoughtful, practical analysis that adds real value for anyone evaluating build and release automation tools — thanks again for posting!
ReplyDeleteThank you for providing this thorough comparison. Seeing AnthillPro and Atlassian tools side by side is very beneficial, especially since they are both very powerful in different ways. I've frequently found it difficult to comprehend not only the features but also how they genuinely affect workflow choices. Your analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each tool made it much more evident where each one excels. The sections that covered practical use cases, such as build management, release coordination, and integration with other DevOps tools, particularly impressed me; these are the specifics that assist teams in selecting the best option rather than relying solely on name recognition. To make applying this comparison even simpler, future posts should include a brief summary table or list of decision criteria that highlights the situations in which each tool is most appropriate (e.g., small teams vs. enterprise pipelines). All things considered, this seemed like a well-considered, useful analysis that truly benefits anyone assessing build and release automation tools. Once again, thank you for sharing!
ReplyDelete